The Fact Hunter

James Arrabito, artist, lecturer, and evangelist, researched the history of Catholicism and the Jesuits in his search for an understanding of the biblical prophecies of Daniel and Revelation. In this lecture, recorded in 1985 in Angwin, CA, he shares from their own writings the origin and purpose of the Jesuit Order. Jim, along with two of his sons, lost his life in a plane crash in 1990.

Email: [email protected]

In this episode, we begin with the tornadoes that tore through our area and use that moment to step into a broader investigation—tracing weather manipulation from 19th-century experimentation to Operation Popeye and the questions that remain today. From there, the conversation widens into a series of signals across history and current events: Jim Garrison, resurfacing clips from Bill Cooper and Robert Welch, and the steady drumbeat of political rhetoric pushing war abroad while cultural and spiritual decay grows at home. We examine topics like Canada’s MAiD program, the influence of lobbying power, declining churches, secretive societies, and the ongoing battle over language, truth, and identity. Taken together, these are not isolated headlines but pieces of a larger pattern—one that points to a coordinated shaping of society, perception, and belief, and ultimately a deeper spiritual war for the hearts and minds of people.

Email: [email protected]

In this Fact Hunter Classic Audio, we go back to 1958 to hear a speech from Robert Welch, founder of the John Birch Society, delivered during the early years of the Cold War. In this recording, Welch outlines what he believed was a long-range strategy designed to gradually reshape American society through economic policy, expanding federal power, influence over education, and shifts in public opinion. Agree or disagree with his conclusions, this recording stands as a fascinating historical snapshot of the concerns and debates shaping the American political landscape of that era. As always, we present the material so you can listen and evaluate it for yourself.

Email us: [email protected]

Is the Government Legally Killing Us? Scott Schara’s new book, which will be released on March 10, 2026, is a relentless search for the truth after the death of his daughter, Grace Schara, in a Wisconsin hospital. Framed as both a legal and moral reckoning, Schara draws on court filings, regulatory history, and firsthand experience to uncover an agenda that you have to be sitting down to believe. It establishes that the medical system we’ve been programmed to trust is killing us and that the legal system protects the guilty—what the author calls “the crime of the millennium.”

Links: 
Is the Government Legally Killing Us?: Is the Evidence Obvious? How Fear of Death and the Illusion of Freedom Turn Us Into Accomplices to Evil

Amazon:
https://a.co/d/0iSAT5LV

Barnes & Noble-
https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/is-the-government-legally-killing-us-by-graces-dad-scott-schara/1149494499;jsessionid=0D3B5E6DA5EEA813923470A456B7D082.prodny_store02-atgap03?ean=9798994180709

GoodReads:
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/247934202-is-the-government-legally-killing-us?from_search=true&from_srp=true&qid=fAppcTNIzt&rank=1

Our Amazing Grace Website: https://ouramazinggrace.net/home

Substack: https://ouramazinggrace.substack.com

Recent commentary surrounding Professor Jiang’s three predictions centers on escalating Middle East tensions, expanding regional war risks, and the possibility that U.S. policy decisions could trigger wider instability if deterrence postures shift or appear inconsistent. His framework suggests that symbolic military moves, alliance signaling, and narrative framing in media will shape public perception as much as battlefield realities. At the same time, reports of senior NCOs facing counseling for criticizing Israel on social media have raised concerns among some veterans about the boundaries between personal speech and military professionalism. The tension sits at the intersection of constitutional rights, Department of Defense conduct policies, and the unique restrictions placed on service members, especially those in leadership roles, where public commentary on foreign policy can be interpreted as undermining cohesion or discipline.

Email: [email protected]