100% Hockey

The panel analyzes Canada’s structured, composed performance, highlighting their defensive commitment, in-game adjustments, and ability to control momentum. With Canada now outscoring opponents 10-1 through two games, Hitchcock explains why their balance, discipline, and chemistry make them difficult to play against.
They also examine Finland’s impressive win over Sweden, and what it signals about the depth and competitiveness of the tournament. The conversation explores how goal differential could play a major role in determining seeding, and why managing games properly is critical in the Olympic format.
Additional topics include:

Canada’s defensive composure and team-first structure

Finland’s ability to execute in high-pressure matchups

The increasing parity across Olympic hockey nations

Potential challenges ahead for the United States

Why Canada and the U.S. remain the favorites to reach the gold medal game

Canada and the United States opened their Olympic tournaments with convincing wins, and John Shannon is joined by Daren Millard and guest analyst Ken Hitchcock to break down what stood out.
The panel analyzes Canada’s 5-0 victory over Czechia, highlighting the team’s structure, puck support, and overall coordination. Hitchcock points to Canada’s chemistry and execution, along with a composed performance from goaltender Jordan Binnington, as key factors in the dominant result. They also discuss how players like Connor McDavid influenced the pace and controlled key moments.
They also examine Team USA’s 5-1 win over Latvia, focusing on the Americans’ defensive mobility, lineup balance, and ability to transition quickly. The conversation explores how chemistry between players such as Mark Stone and Auston Matthews could become a major advantage as the tournament progresses.
Additional topics include:

Officiating differences between NHL and international play

How rink dimensions and neutral-zone spacing affect systems

Managing energy and preparation during the compressed Olympic schedule

Why chemistry and structure are already separating contenders

Day 1 of the Olympic men’s hockey tournament is in the books, and John Shannon is joined by Ken Hitchcock and Mike Zeisberger to break down what actually mattered.
The panel analyzes the performances of Slovakia, Finland, and Sweden, focusing on how teams adapted to the smaller rink and why controlling the middle of the ice immediately became the tournament’s defining factor.
They dive into:

Why Slovakia’s performance turned heads

Sweden’s composure and structure

Finland’s disciplined, system-driven approach

How rink size is impacting pace and spacing

The importance of goaltending and physical play in a short tournament

Lineup decisions and player rotations already shaping momentum

The conversation also turns to Canada and the United States, examining what adjustments they may need to make as the competition tightens and emotions rise.

Olympic hockey coverage begins on 100% Hockey as John Shannon is joined by Ken Hitchcock and Scott Burnsideto preview the men’s tournament at the Winter Games in Milan.
Hitchcock breaks down how the tournament may be decided on the ice, focusing on chemistry, systems, and coaching influence. He contrasts the speed and transition game of the United States with Canada’s cycle-heavy approach, and explains why teams like Finland and Germany could be dangerous in a short, high-pressure tournament. Hitchcock also discusses coaching styles, including why Jon Cooper’s personality could be a key factor behind the Canadian bench.
Burnside joins from Milan to provide on-the-ground insight, confirming strong arena conditions, solid ice reviews, and a rising sense of anticipation among teams. The group looks at roster depth across the field, early lineup questions, and why goaltending and special teams could ultimately decide games in such a compressed format.

Olympic hockey coverage begins on 100% Hockey as John Shannon is joined by Ken Hitchcock and Scott Burnsideto preview the men’s tournament at the Winter Games in Milan.
Hitchcock breaks down how the tournament may be decided on the ice, focusing on chemistry, systems, and coaching influence. He contrasts the speed and transition game of the United States with Canada’s cycle-heavy approach, and explains why teams like Finland and Germany could be dangerous in a short, high-pressure tournament. Hitchcock also discusses coaching styles, including why Jon Cooper’s personality could be a key factor behind the Canadian bench.
Burnside joins from Milan to provide on-the-ground insight, confirming strong arena conditions, solid ice reviews, and a rising sense of anticipation among teams. The group looks at roster depth across the field, early lineup questions, and why goaltending and special teams could ultimately decide games in such a compressed format.