AI Security Podcast

In this episode, Ashish and Caleb discuss the internet-breaking preview of Project Mythos, an unreleased AI model from Anthropic that has shown an unprecedented, terrifying ability to reason through code and automatically generate working zero-day exploits .We dive into the conversations surrounding Project Glasswing, Anthropic's initiative to share this model with select partners (like Palo Alto and CrowdStrike) before public release, allowing them a 100-day window to patch critical vulnerabilities . Caleb explains why this level of AI reasoning isn't just hype: early testers are reporting that Mythos is not only finding zero-days, but actively detecting dormant intrusions within their own networks .If you are a CISO or security practitioner, this episode talks about it all. We discuss why the traditional 30-day patch cycle is dead, why "assuming breach" is now mandatory, and why 60% of legacy security vendors might not survive this shift .

Questions asked:
(00:00) Introduction: The Hype Around Anthropic's Project Mythos (04:00) What is Project Mythos? (Reasoning and Finding Zero-Days) (06:50) Project Glasswing: The 100-Day Partner Patch Window (08:30) The Controversy: Did Anthropic Pick the Right Partners? (12:30) Why Anthropic Doesn't Have the Compute to Scan the Whole Internet (15:10) The Insider View: Mythos is Finding Dormant Intrusions (16:30) Why 60% of Security Vendors Will Go Away (19:30) Hype vs. Reality: GeoHot's Comments on Small Models (21:30) Eliminating False Positives in Static Code Analysis (23:50) The Zero-Day Clock: Time to Exploit Drops to Under 6 Hours (25:50) The Ethics of Zero-Days: Should Mythos Be Released at All? (34:30) The CISO Action Plan: Speeding Up Patching (Hours vs. Days) (44:50) The 3rd Party SaaS Problem: What to Do When You Can't Patch (46:10) "Assume Breach": Why Deception (Honeypots) is the New Priority (57:30) Empowering Non-Tech Teams to Build Detections (01:02:10) AI Makes Cheesy "Hacker Movies" a Reality

Resources mentioned during the episode:
Assessing Claude Mythos Preview’s cybersecurity capabilities
Project Glasswing
Zero Day Clock

With over 70 startups claiming to have built the perfect "AI SOC Analyst" or "AI Threat Hunter," how do you separate the real products from the vaporware? Recorded live at Decibel RSAC Founder Festival, Ashish and Caleb hosted a heated panel with Edward Wu (Founder & CEO, Dropzone AI) and Lou Manousos (Co-Founder & CEO, Ent AI). The group debates the controversial claim that AI can provide 100% threat prevention and exposes the dirty secret of the industry: Many AI startups are "cheating" by hiding human analysts behind their software.If you were a CISO or security practitioner navigating the vendor floor at RSA, this episode provides a BS-detector framework. Learn why an AI wrapper around Claude Code isn't enough, why "consistency" is the ultimate test for AI agents, and how to verify if a startup actually has real-world, paying enterprise deployments (and not just friendly design partners) .
Questions asked:
(00:00) Introduction: Live with Decibel(01:30) Meet the Panel: Edward Wu (Dropzone) & Lou Manousos (Ent) (03:40) The Great Debate: Has the Industry Given Up on Prevention? (05:50) What Has AI Actually Solved? (Repetitive Work vs. Context) (09:00) How to Spot BS on the RSA Show Floor (11:30) Defining an AI Agent: Chatbots vs. Threat Hunters (13:40) The Claude Code Problem: Is Your Product Just a Wrapper? (16:50) The 80% Accuracy Trap & Why Consistency is Key (21:30) Proving ROI: Evaluating AI Agents Like Human Employees (24:50) The Dirty Secret: Humans Hiding Behind AI Startups (26:30) Spotting Fake Customer Logos (28:30) Audience Q&A: Scaling the SOC vs. Replacing Humans (36:10) Forward Deployed Engineering & Personalized Software (40:30) Reimagining Security Architecture from the Inside Out (43:30) How Ent Detects Remote Workers Outsourcing Their Jobs (45:30) Final Thoughts: Asking Vendors for Real Proof Points

What does it actually look like to run security inside one of Europe's fastest-growing AI companies? In this episode, recorded live at the Munich Cybersecurity Conference (MCSC), Ashish Rajan sat down with Igor Andriushchenko Head of Security at Lovable, the AI-native platform that lets anyone build and ship full applications without writing a line of code.
Igor joined Lovable as employee #40. Six months later, the team had grown to 150+. Developers were running multi-agent workflows overnight, PMs were pushing pull requests, and the volume of code changes was hitting numbers that challenged every traditional security process they had. This is the security story nobody talks about in AI-native scale-ups and Igor lived it.
In this episode, they cover: why your CI/CD pipeline is being load-tested to destruction by AI-generated churn · how to use PAM (Privileged Access Management) as a practical guardrail for AI agents that can't escalate to production secrets · why the allow-list vs deny-list logic is reversed for AI agents compared to traditional security · the overlooked SCA supply chain risk when AI recommends unmaintained or hallucinated packages · why old SAST tools are failing and what the new generation of agentic code scanners does differently · how to identify and manage advanced, intermediate, and basic AI users in your org without killing their productivity · and the practical "crawl, walk, run" approach to building internal AI security tooling that actually sticks.
Igor also shares how Lovable's security team built an incident response AI skill, uses reachability analysis agents to triage SCA findings for enterprise customers, and why the real investment isn't in the AI model, it's in the skills ecosystem and data connections underneath.

Questions asked:
(00:00) Introduction: Securing the AI Workforce(03:50) Who is Igor Andriushchenko? (Head of Security, Lovable) (06:10) The Churn of Change: Why AI Will Break Your CI/CD (10:40) The FOMO Problem: Don't Force AI Adoption (11:50) The "Air Pocket" Strategy for Safe AI Experimentation (14:00) The Context Paradox: More Access = Dumber AI (17:40) Managing Agent Sprawl and "Advanced" Users (19:40) Why You Must Treat AI Agents Like Human Developers (PAM Controls) (22:30) The Need for AI Telemetry & Visibility (27:50) Blurring Roles: When PMs Become Developers (31:30) Why You Must Use "Deny Lists" Instead of "Allow Lists" for AI (34:30) AI SAST vs. Traditional SAST: Finding Business Logic Flaws (39:40) Supply Chain Risks: When AI Recommends Dead Libraries (45:40) Building Custom AI Skills for Incident Response (52:50) Fun Questions: Battlefield, Team Culture, and Comfort Food

RSA Conference 2026 is here and the AI agent hype machine is louder than ever. In this episode, Ashish and Caleb cut through the noise and arm CISOs, practitioners, and security teams with a clear-eyed view of what's actually happening in AI security this year.
From the vendor floor at RSAC to the future of internal security automation, Caleb and Ashish speak about why 70% of "AI agent security" vendors can't even define what an agent is, why security team consolidation around 2–3 major platforms (plus internal AI capability) may be the most underrated CISO strategy of 2026, and why the window from vulnerability disclosure to live exploitation has collapsed from months to under two days.
They also explore the emerging idea of a centralised AI automation function inside security teams and why the future of security isn't buying more point solutions, it's building internal AI capability on top of a standardised vendor stack.

Questions asked:
(00:00) Introduction: Preparing for RSAC 2026(03:50) The Year of the "AI Agent" Marketing Hype (06:50) The Secret to AI Context: Enterprise Search (Glean) (09:50) Why Your SOC Needs a Centralized AI Platform Team (13:30) The #1 Question to Ask Vendors at RSAC: API Access (16:50) The Myth of MCP (Model Context Protocol) as the Gold Standard (20:50) Why RSAC is Too Noisy: Vibe Coding & 1,000 New Startups (22:30) Is Capital Raised the Only Signal of Trust? (24:50) Prediction: CISOs Will Fire 500 Vendors and Consolidate (30:50) The Build vs. Buy Debate for AI Security Features (35:50) Surviving RSAC: Sorting Signal from Noise (38:50) The Problem with "End-to-End" AI Agent Claims (41:50) Are AI-Driven Attacks Real? (44:50) The Zero-Day Clock: From 5 Months to 2 Days (48:50) RSAC Events: Live Recordings and CISO Panels

Resources spoken about during the episode:
RSAC 2026
BSidesSF 2026
Glean
Zero Day Clock

Did Anthropic just kill the AppSec industry? Following the announcement of Claude Code Security, a tool that finds, reasons about, and fixes code vulnerabilities, major security stocks dropped by 8% .In this episode of the AI Security Podcast, Ashish and Caleb break down the reality behind the hype. Caleb explains why using AI for SAST (Static Application Security Testing) is "a no-brainer," noting that many open-source projects and startups have already been doing exactly what Anthropic announced . We discuss why this actually validates the shift toward AI-automated remediation.The conversation goes deeper into the future of the cybersecurity market: Will giant foundation models start acquiring security companies? Will they offer "premium gas" (cheaper tokens) for building on their platforms? And most importantly, what does this mean for AppSec engineers whose jobs involve triaging false positives?
Questions asked:
(00:00) Introduction: The Claude Code Security Announcement(02:50) What is Claude Code Security? (Finding & Reasoning about VULNs) (03:50) Market Overreaction: Why Security Stocks Dropped 8% (05:10) Why AI-Powered SAST is Not New (OpenAI & Open Source doing it already) (07:20) Will AI Take AppSec Jobs? (Triaging False Positives) (09:00) "Shift Left" on Steroids: Auto-Fixing and PR Submission (11:30) The Threat to Legacy Vendors: Why CrowdStrike's Moat is Safe (14:30) Historical Context: AI is the New Calculator/Typewriter (18:20) The "Gasoline" Theory: Foundation Models as Fuel (21:00) Will Anthropic Acquire Security Startups? (26:30) Anthropic's Go-To-Market Strategy: Building AI SOCs (33:30) Startup Survival: Can Innovation Outpace Big Tech? (41:30) The Future of Threat Intel: Is the Legacy Moat Disappearing? (48:20) Negotiating with Vendors using AI Leverage (53:30) Using Evals for Organizational Anomaly Detection