Taylor Lorenz’s Power User

Why Does The Internet Think Every Famous Person Is A Clone? The Jim Carrey Clone Conspiracy Explained
Support my independent journalism:
🙏 Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/taylorlorenz     
🗞️ Buy a paid subscription to my Substack: https://www.usermag.co    
After his appearance at the Cesar Awards in Paris, the internet exploded with a bizarre theory: Jim Carrey had been replaced by a clone or body double. TikTok, X, and conspiracy communities are convinced something is off, from his face to his mannerisms. But it's not just him. A week after the Jim Carrey conspiracy went viral, people began claiming Benjamin Netanyahu was a clone or had a body double. 
Will Sommer is a reporter at The Bulwark and author of the False Flag newsletter. He joins me to break down the Jim Carrey clone conspiracy theories, the rise of celebrity clone conspiracy theories in our culture, how crowdsourced AI driven investigations are fueling them, and what exactly is making half the internet so convinced that major figures in Hollywood, media and politics are secret body doubles. 
 
From Paul McCartney’s “Paul is dead” rumor to Avril Lavigne’s alleged double, to modern TikTok investigations we dive into:
How social media fuels conspiracy theories

Why aging celebrities trigger these reactions

The role of AI 

The psychology behind viral conspiracies

Follow me:
https://www.instagram.com/taylorlorenz      
https://www.instagram.com/taylorlorenz3.0     
https://www.tiktok.com/@taylorlorenz 
https://bsky.app/profile/taylorlorenz.bsky.social  
https://twitter.com/taylorlorenz

What is Section 230 and why is everyone trying to kill it?
Support my independent journalism:
🙏 Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/cw/taylorlorenz    
🗞️ Buy a paid subscription to my Substack: https://www.usermag.co   
In the latest episode of my Section 230 mini-series I’m joined by Mike Masnick, founder of Techdirt and host of the amazing Section 230 podcast Otherwise Objectionable. 
Mike breaks down how the whole drama around Section 230 began, and how this extremely inconsequential law became vilified by the mainstream media. We also debunk the biggest myths about Section 230 and breaking down how the law actually works, and why removing it would make Big Tech even more powerful.
Read Mike's excellent Section 230 myth busting on Techdirt:
https://www.techdirt.com/2020/06/23/hello-youve-been-referred-here-because-youre-wrong-about-section-230-communications-decency-act/

BUY COLA CORP APPAREL: https://www.thecolacorporation.com  (None of this is sponsored, I just really want people to support him!!!!) 
Support my independent journalism:
🙏 Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/cw/taylorlorenz     
🗞️ Buy a paid subscription to my Substack: https://www.usermag.co    
What happens when the government doesn't like your t-shirts? 
Joe, founder of Cola Corporation, has dealt with DMCA takedowns, letters from the LAPD, shipments seized by US Customs and Border Protection, and bans from advertising on virtually every major social platform including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Pinterest, and Etsy.
In this episode of Free Speech Friday, I sit down with him to talk about what it's really like to run an independent political clothing brand that challenges power. We talk about fashion and clothing as tools of resistance and the high price of using fashion as a tool for political criticism. 
Clothing has long been a way to communicate political beliefs, from protest shirts to campaign merch. But in the era of social media platforms, algorithms, and online marketplaces, the boundaries of acceptable expression are constantly being tested.
The designs mentioned in this episode:⁠ https://www.thecolacorporation.com/collections/taylor⁠
THE FREE SPEECH 1A SWEATER:⁠ https://www.thecolacorporation.com/products/1a-sparks⁠  
Topics discussed in this interview include:
• The rise of political merchandise online
• Social media censorship and advertising bans
• Etsy and TikTok removing controversial designs
• Police legal threats over a T-shirt slogan
• Government seizure of political clothing
• The Streisand effect and viral controversy
• Free speech and political expression through fashion
Follow me:
https://www.instagram.com/taylorlorenz        
https://www.instagram.com/taylorlorenz3.0       
https://www.tiktok.com/@taylorlorenz   
https://bsky.app/profile/taylorlorenz.bsky.social    
https://twitter.com/taylorlorenz

Is The Nicki Minaj Bot Scandal the Future of Politics?
Support my independent journalism:
🙏 Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/cw/taylorlorenz    
🗞️ Buy a paid subscription to my Substack: https://www.usermag.co   
The lines between entertainment, celebrity beef, and political propaganda are blurring. A few weeks ago, a POLITICO report sent shockwaves through Stan Twitter and the MAGA internet. 
The story reported that Nicki Minaj’s sudden pro-Trump pivot was being secretly propped up by an army of tens of thousands of bots. But is this a case of genuine political shifting, or is it the result of "invisible machinery" running beneath the surface of our cultural life?
Pop culture commentator Olay Olurinatti joins me to dive deep into the 24-page report from the AI intelligence firm that claims over 18,000 bots were used to amplify Nicki’s conservative messaging. We explore Nicki's history, from her 2012 Mitt Romney praise to her "Black Barbies" resistance era, and unpack what changed and what role the internet, and platform incentives have played. 
Follow me:
https://www.instagram.com/taylorlorenz       
https://www.instagram.com/taylorlorenz3.0      
https://www.tiktok.com/@taylorlorenz  
https://bsky.app/profile/taylorlorenz.bsky.social   
https://twitter.com/taylorlorenz 
We break down:
The "Coordinate Effort" vs. Organic Fandom (The Barbs).

The role of Elon Musk’s X aka Twitter in pushing right-wing narratives.

The beef between Cardi B’s team and Trump’s digital strategists.

How algorithmic preconditioning is shaping the 2026 midterms.

How the Right is successfully infiltrating pop culture fandoms.

Are social media algorithms actually destroying the internet? 
Support my independent journalism:
🙏 Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/cw/taylorlorenz    
🗞️ Buy a paid subscription to my Substack: https://www.usermag.co   
In this episode of my Section 230 series, I sit down with Eric Goldman, Associate Dean for Research and Professor at Santa Clara Law, and one of the nation's foremost experts on internet law, to debunk the biggest myths surrounding Section 230 and algorithmic amplification.
I hear all the time: platforms should lose their Section 230 protections because they use algorithms. But what actually is an algorithm? Most people don't even understand the basics. Eric and I discuss how even the beloved "reverse chronological order" feed is an algorithm, and why it actually rewards spammers, trolls, and bad actors.
We dive deep into how politicians are using the "techlash" to gain power, why censorship has become a bipartisan value, and how companies like Meta actually want Section 230 gone so they can wipe out their smaller competitors. 
From the dangers of age verification laws to the truth about how algorithms protect us from navigating an internet that functions like a giant folder of Google Drive links, we discuss the real existential threats to the open web, and how arguments about "algorithms" miss the real powers at play. 
Topics Covered:
Why reverse chronological feeds encourage bad content

How algorithms function as basic editorial choices

Why Meta/Facebook lobbies to remove Section 230 to build competitive moats

The bipartisan push for internet censorship and government control

The devastating impacts of age verification laws and losing youth online spaces