Verdict with Ted Cruz

1. United Nations Funding Crisis
The United Nations is facing financial collapse because the United States has reduced or withdrawn funding.
This is a move to stop funding “woke” & ideological programs.
The UN is ineffective, bureaucratic, and overly dependent on U.S. taxpayer money.
Symbolic examples (turned-off escalators, reduced heating) are used to emphasize desperation and mismanagement.
The U.S. withdrew from 66 international organizations and treaties, framed as: Cost-saving
Anti-globalist
Pro-American sovereignty

Many of these organizations are described as obscure, wasteful, or hostile to U.S. interests.
The underlying message is that global institutions dilute U.S. power without delivering value.
2. Media Merger and National Security Concerns
Focus shifts to a major media merger (Netflix / Warner Bros / Paramount context).
Concerns raised include: Foreign influence, especially money from the Middle East or China
National security implications
Loss of American cultural control

The argument is that entertainment media shapes public perception more than news.
Hollywood and major streaming platforms are portrayed as: Predominantly left-wing
Hostile to conservative viewpoints
Engaged in ideological indoctrination

Executives are challenged on whether their content fairly represents conservatives.
The inability to name conservative-oriented programming is used as evidence of bias.
The merger is framed as dangerous because it could: Concentrate cultural and political influence
Amplify a single ideological viewpoint

The Department of Justice and FCC are identified as key gatekeepers.
The timeline for approval is described as months to years, with high stakes for media freedom.
3. Save America Act (Voter ID Legislation)
Proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote
Photo ID to vote

The bill is common-sense and widely supported, including among minority voters.
Democrats, particularly Chuck Schumer, are accused of: Using “Jim Crow” rhetoric to scare voters
Ignoring polling that shows broad support for voter ID

Opposition is attributed to: Desire to preserve election vulnerabilities
Partisan strategy rather than public opinion

Ballot harvesting is described as inherently vulnerable to abuse.
Examples (nursing homes, paid operatives) are used to argue: Elderly and vulnerable voters can be exploited
Ballots can be selectively discarded

The Carter–Baker Commission is cited to legitimize these concerns.
Acknowledges internal Republican resistance and logistical challenges.
Emphasizes urgency and political pressure as tools to pass the bill.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz
X: https://x.com/tedcruz
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. SAVE America Act (Election Law & Voter ID)
Core Argument
The SAVE America Act would: Require proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote
Require photo ID to vote

Democrats are portrayed as unanimously opposed, preventing passage due to the Senate’s 60‑vote threshold.
Strategic Claim
Cruz argues Republicans should: Force a “real” filibuster (continuous floor speeches)
Make Democratic opposition politically and physically costly

He frames Democratic resistance as intentional rather than procedural.
Public Opinion Framing
Polling is cited (CNN, Pew) to claim: Broad bipartisan and multiracial support for voter ID

Democratic leadership (especially Chuck Schumer) is accused of ignoring their own voters.
2. Voter Fraud & Ballot Harvesting
Claims Presented
Ballot harvesting is described as: A system that enables fraud, especially among elderly or vulnerable populations

Democrats are accused of: Supporting policies that increase fraud opportunities
Reversing recommendations from the Carter–Baker Commission

There is justification for: Photo ID laws
Restrictions on mail-in voting
Limits on third-party ballot collection

3. Somali Welfare Fraud in Minnesota
Central Allegation
Massive welfare fraud in Minnesota tied to programs serving the Somali immigrant community.
Figures cited include: Up to half of $18 billion in welfare spending allegedly lost to fraud
Disproportionately high welfare participation rates among Somali households

Democratic state officials are accused of: Knowing about the fraud
Allowing it to continue for political gain
Silencing whistleblowers

Stolen welfare funds indirectly finance al‑Shabab, a terrorist organization

4. Medical Policy Shift on Gender Surgeries for Minors
Key Development
The American Society of Plastic Surgeons and the American Medical Association are described as: Reversing prior support for “gender‑affirming surgeries” for minors
Now recommending deferral until adulthood

Causal Explanation
The reversal is attributed to: A high‑profile malpractice lawsuit by a detransitioner
Legal and financial risk to medical institution

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz
X: https://x.com/tedcruz
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Meet my friends, Clay Travis and Buck Sexton! If you love Verdict, the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show might also be in your audio wheelhouse. Politics, news analysis, and some pop culture and comedy thrown in too.

Here’s a sample episode recapping four takeaways. Give the guys a listen and then follow and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.

Proof of Life in an AI Age

Clay Travis and Buck Sexton begin by highlighting President Donald Trump’s remarks at the National Prayer Breakfast, where he addressed faith in public life, new Department of Education guidance reaffirming the right to prayer in public schools, and ongoing federal responses to unrest and crime in major U.S. cities, including Minneapolis. They preview Trump’s wide‑ranging interview with NBC News’ Tom Llamas, which becomes a central theme throughout the hour.

A major portion of Hour 1 of the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show is devoted to the alarming and emotional kidnapping case involving the mother of NBC News anchor Savannah Guthrie. The hosts play audio from Guthrie’s public plea and analyze the unusual nature of a modern‑day ransom kidnapping in the United States. Clay and Buck discuss why the crime appears targeted rather than random, speculate on possible inside knowledge of the victim’s home and routines, and explore why this type of crime is now rare in America compared to other parts of the world. They also examine how advances in surveillance, DNA evidence, and digital tracking make successful ransom kidnappings increasingly difficult. Throughout the segment, they note that President Trump and FBI Director Kash Patel have committed significant federal resources to the case, underscoring its national visibility and seriousness.

Kamala Woofs?

A lively and humorous debate about the future of the Democratic Party, centered on Vice President Kamala Harris and the 2028 presidential race. Clay Travis sharply mocks what he characterizes as Kamala Harris’s inauthentic political style, using her recent “Kamala HQ” announcement as an example, and compares it to a famously absurd storyline from The Office. This sparks a prolonged back‑and‑forth between Clay and Buck over whether Harris will run for president again—and whether she could realistically become the Democratic nominee. Clay argues that Harris is likely to run and could benefit from changes to the Democratic primary calendar that elevate Southern states with large Black Democratic electorates, while Buck strongly disagrees, insisting that her past electoral failures and poor performance in swing states make her nomination politically disastrous.

The conversation broadens into a larger analysis of Democratic strategy, race, primary politics, and voter turnout. Clay suggests Democrats may once again make a risky strategic decision based on identity politics and narrow electoral margins, while Buck counters that party elites will ultimately coalesce around a different candidate, particularly California Governor Gavin Newsom. Throughout the hour, the hosts reference betting odds, past primary performances, and voter behavior to argue their competing cases, turning their disagreement into an ongoing bet that becomes a recurring and entertaining thread.

Clay's Needle and Poop Walk

Clay delivers an extended firsthand account of his morning walk through downtown San Francisco ahead of Super Bowl weekend. Broadcasting from the iHeartRadio studios in the city, he describes being advised not to walk for safety reasons and then encountering widespread homelessness, drug use, abandoned needles, and human feces along a short route in the city’s core. Clay uses the experience to argue that urban decay, public drug use, and lack of sanitation are policy failures, contending that visible filth and disorder directly correlate with higher crime rates and declining quality of life in major American cities like San Francisco and Washington, D.C.

A central segment of Hour 3 of the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show features a detailed live update from Daily Wire reporter Lynden Blake, who monitored the full Arizona press conference on the Nancy Guthrie kidnapping. Blake confirms that a single ransom note was sent to multiple outlets, demanding millions of dollars in Bitcoin, with an initial deadline the same day and a secondary deadline the following Monday accompanied by explicit threats. She explains why authorities believe the notes are credible, citing accurate descriptions of the crime scene, and discusses lingering questions about security cameras, possible inside knowledge of the home, and inconsistencies regarding forced entry. The hosts also explore the family’s request for proof of life and the challenges posed by AI‑generated imagery, underscoring how modern technology complicates hostage negotiations.

Sen. Dave McCormick

A substantive interview with Senator Dave McCormick, who addresses major national and state policy concerns. McCormick discusses the growing national debt, massive federal deficits, and what he views as Washington’s unwillingness to enact even modest spending reforms. He criticizes resistance to work requirements for able‑bodied Medicaid recipients and warns that without structural changes, entitlement programs will collapse under their own weight. McCormick also speaks at length about bipartisan cooperation in Pennsylvania, highlighting his working relationship with Democratic Senator John Fetterman, their shared stance on issues like fentanyl, energy production, Israel, and government shutdowns, and his willingness to publicly defend Fetterman when he was attacked by his own party.

Election integrity and voting laws are another focal point, as McCormick strongly advocates for the SAVE Act and nationwide voter ID requirements. He argues that requiring proof of citizenship is a basic safeguard supported by overwhelming majorities of both Republicans and Democrats and says lawmakers must publicly justify opposition to voter ID to restore trust in U.S. elections. The conversation then shifts to the economy, where McCormick credits President Donald Trump’s tax cuts, deregulation, and energy policies with fueling major investment in Pennsylvania, including tens of billions of dollars committed to energy infrastructure and data centers. He frames U.S. energy dominance and AI development as critical components of global competition, particularly with China.

Make sure you never miss a second of the show by subscribing to the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton show podcast wherever you get your podcasts! ihr.fm/3InlkL8

For the latest updates from Clay and Buck: https://www.clayandbuck.com/

Connect with Clay Travis and Buck Sexton on Social Media:
X - https://x.com/clayandbuck
FB - https://www.facebook.com/ClayandBuck/
IG - https://www.instagram.com/clayandbuck/
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck
Rumble - https://rumble.com/c/ClayandBuck
TikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@clayandbuck

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Economic Policy & Interest Rates
Trump expressed strong confidence that U.S. interest rates will be lowered, stating there is “not much doubt” the Federal Reserve will act.
He emphasized that lower interest rates would benefit consumers and businesses through cheaper borrowing.
Trump stated that his Federal Reserve chair nominee understands his priority on lowering interest rates and implied the nominee would not have been chosen otherwise.
He argued that economic growth will eventually outweigh national debt, framing debt as manageable due to incoming capital and renewed growth.
Trump criticized Democrats for allegedly inflating employment numbers by expanding the federal workforce, contrasting this with his reduction of federal jobs and reliance on private-sector employment.
2. Federal Government Size & Spending
Trump claimed his administration reduced hundreds of thousands of federal jobs, arguing these workers transitioned into the private sector.
He positioned this as an effort to reduce wasteful government spending and improve efficiency.
He strongly criticized the cost overruns of a Federal Reserve building renovation, calling it the most expensive per square foot in U.S. history.
Trump denied that an investigation related to the Federal Reserve was personal retaliation, stating it was being handled independently by the DOJ.
3. Corporate Regulation & Antitrust
Trump said he would not personally intervene in high‑profile corporate antitrust matters, including the Netflix–Paramount–Warner Bros. Discovery situation.
He emphasized allowing the Department of Justice to independently review such deals.
This was presented as a shift toward reducing political interference in corporate competition.
4. Immigration Policy
Trump stated his administration had made “great strides” on immigration.
He acknowledged learning from experience and said a “softer touch” may be appropriate in some enforcement situations, while still maintaining overall toughness.
This framing suggested adaptability rather than a full policy change.
5. Foreign Policy & Iran
Trump issued strong warnings toward Iran, asserting that its leadership should be “very worried.”
He claimed the U.S. had destroyed Iran’s nuclear capabilities, preventing it from acquiring a nuclear weapon.
Trump threatened renewed military action if Iran attempts to restart its nuclear program, stating the U.S. is monitoring potential new sites.
He credited these actions with restoring Middle East stability and reducing fear among regional allies.
6. Third Term Question
When asked about the possibility of remaining president beyond a second term, Trump avoided a direct answer, responding humorously.
He reiterated that his sole purpose was to “Make America Great Again” and said his administration’s success reflects national success.
No concrete statements suggesting an attempt to remain in office were made.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. U.S. Government & Political Context
The podcast opens with a brief discussion of the government shutdown that ended quickly, and is evidence of political posturing rather than substantive conflict.
The transition sets the stage for broader national security concerns rather than domestic legislative issues.
2. Emergence of the Polisario Front as a National Security Threat
The Polisario Front, a separatist group in Western Sahara founded in 1973, is presented as an underrecognized but growing terrorist threat.
Iran is funding, training, and supplying the group, attempting to turn it into a West African proxy similar to the Houthis.
Alleged activities include: Collaboration with Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and Hezbollah
Use of drones, weapons transfers, and regional destabilization

Labeling the group as a terrorist organization is essential, this represents a dangerous blind spot in U.S. counterterrorism policy.
3. Accusation of Institutional Caution and “Deep State” Resistance
State Department officials are portrayed as intentionally evasive during Senate testimony.
The analysis claims this reluctance stems from: Ongoing diplomatic efforts in Africa
Desire to avoid disrupting negotiations involving Morocco and Algeria

4. Iran at a “Tipping Point”
Iran has become internally fragile, facing: Widespread protests
Mass casualties allegedly ranging from 10,000–40,000 protesters

The Iranian regime’s actions (e.g., drones near U.S. naval assets, attempted tanker seizures) are interpreted as provocations meant to rally domestic support and distract from internal collapse.: Negotiations with Iran are a delaying tactic
The U.S. should support Iranian protesters directly, including by providing weapons

Regime change is framed as: Preferable if carried out by Iranians themselves
Potentially the largest positive national security shift since the Cold War if successful.

5. Global Domino Effect Narrative
Iran is grouped with Venezuela and Cuba as regimes allegedly near collapse.
Simultaneous democratic transitions in all three would represent a historic geopolitical realignment in favor of U.S. interests.
6. Netflix–Warner Bros. Merger & National Security Concerns
The proposed $83 billion Netflix–Warner Bros. merger is criticized on two main grounds: Cultural and ideological influence The entertainment industry is portrayed as overwhelmingly left‑leaning and hostile to conservative or pro‑American perspectives.
Concern that increased market power could amplify ideological “propaganda.”

Foreign influence Alarm over foreign (especially Middle Eastern and Chinese) capital shaping American entertainment content.
Content has been altered or censored to appease foreign governments.


The merger is not merely an antitrust issue but as a matter of national sovereignty and cultural security.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz
X: https://x.com/tedcruz
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.