Verdict with Ted Cruz

1. Claimed Greenland/Arctic Framework Deal
President Trump announced a framework for a future agreement involving Greenland and the broader Arctic region, reached through discussions with NATO leadership and U.S. allies.
This is not a military action or invasion, but a diplomatic and security-oriented arrangement still under development.
The deal is framed as long‑term (“forever”), contrasting it with past time‑limited international agreements.
2. Focus on Arctic Security and Strategic Competition
The core justification presented is national and allied security, particularly limiting Russian and Chinese influence in the Arctic.
China’s has a stated interest in Arctic dominance and the deal is preemptive containment.
Greenland is described as strategically important due to geography, security positioning, and mineral resources.
3. Denial of Military Intent
A central theme is the explicit rejection of military force as a means of acquiring Greenland.
Claims of potential invasion were misinformation spread by media and political opponents.
Trump is quoted as saying military action would not be necessary.
4. Use of Economic Leverage (Tariffs)
Trump used tariff threats against European allies as negotiating leverage.
The subsequent removal of tariff threats is evidence that diplomacy succeeded.
This approach is intentional pressure rather than economic aggression.
5. Rejection of Media and Democratic Narratives
Predicting war or invasion
Mischaracterizing Trump’s intentions
Ignoring diplomatic outcomes

6. Introduction of a “Board of Peace” Concept
Separate from Greenland, the document introduces Trump’s idea to create a “Board of Peace”.
This proposed body is an alternative or supplement to the United Nations, which is ineffective.
7. Critique of the United Nations
The UN has had historical failures in: Rwanda
Syria
China’s treatment of Uyghurs
Iran’s protest crackdowns
Myanmar
Sudan

Veto power and authoritarian influence render the UN ineffective.
We need a new peace mechanism under U.S. leadership.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Portrayal of ICE Operations
ICE arrests in Minnesota (Minneapolis/St. Paul) are presented as targeting violent criminal offenders, including: Registered sex offenders
Individuals accused of rape
Individuals with histories of domestic violence, DUI, and sexual assault

These individuals were previously free due to local non‑cooperation with ICE.
ICE is described as fulfilling its intended mission of removing dangerous criminals from communities.
2. Criticism of Democratic Leadership
Minnesota Democratic officials (mayors, city council members, state leaders)
National Democratic figures (Chuck Schumer, Chris Van Hollen, Tina Smith, Stacey Abrams, Jon Ossoff)
Key accusations include:
Shielding criminal undocumented immigrants
Encouraging or excusing obstruction of ICE operations
Falsely portraying ICE as abusive or authoritarian
Refusing to condemn protests that allegedly crossed legal or ethical lines (e.g., disrupting church services)
3. Depiction of Internal Democratic Conflict
There is a “civil war” within the Democratic Party: One faction allegedly wants to abolish ICE outright
Another faction purportedly wants to soften rhetoric while effectively achieving the same outcome

Democrats are accused of strategically “humanizing criminals” and “dehumanizing ICE agents” to influence public perception.
4. Framing of Protests and Activism
Protesters opposing ICE are described as: “Far‑left,” “radical,” or “deranged”
Protecting criminals rather than communities

Protests at or inside churches are portrayed as violations of social and religious norms.
Democratic officials are criticized for characterizing these protests as mostly peaceful and justified.
5. Media and Narrative Control
Mainstream and local media underreport crimes committed by arrested undocumented immigrants
Media figures fail to challenge false or extreme claims made about ICE

ICE agents are framed as unfairly maligned while operating under hostile political conditions.
6. Broader Ideological Framing
The Democratic Party is portrayed as influenced by: Marxism, socialism, and communism
Anti‑police and anti‑law‑enforcement ideology

References to Hitler, Hugo Chávez, and authoritarianism are used to argue that left‑wing populism is dangerous and historically problematic.
7. Pro‑Trump and Law‑and‑Order Message
Donald Trump is: A defender of law enforcement
A counterweight to radical left activism

Voter support for Trump is driven by a desire for public safety, border enforcement, and accountability.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Meet my friends, Clay Travis and Buck Sexton! If you love Verdict, the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show might also be in your audio wheelhouse. Politics, news analysis, and some pop culture and comedy thrown in too.

Here’s a sample episode recapping four takeaways. Give the guys a listen and then follow and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.

Going After Greenland

Reaction to the College Football National Championship, where Indiana defeated Miami in a game Clay Travis and Buck Sexton attended in person alongside President Donald Trump. The hosts describe the atmosphere as overwhelmingly pro‑Indiana despite Miami hosting, highlight Trump’s appearance during the national anthem, and reflect on what they characterize as a renewed sense of public patriotism at major American sporting events.

A deep dive into President Trump’s escalating push to acquire Greenland, which Clay and Buck frame as one of the most consequential and unexpected foreign‑policy stories of the moment. They analyze Trump’s comments asserting that Denmark cannot adequately defend the territory, his insistence that the U.S. “has to have it” for national security reasons, and prediction‑market odds placing roughly a 50‑50 chance on American control of at least part of Greenland in the near future. The hosts connect the potential acquisition to U.S. military strategy, Arctic dominance, rare‑earth minerals, long‑term resource access, and historical precedents like the Louisiana Purchase and the Alaska deal.

Exploring the U.S. military presence at Greenland’s Pituffik Space Base (formerly Thule Air Base) and NATO reactions, including symbolic European military drills. Clay and Buck argue these gestures have not deterred Trump, who has elevated Greenland as a headline issue ahead of the World Economic Forum in Davos. They discuss Trump’s negotiating style—starting with seemingly outrageous positions to force concessions—and speculate on territorial status, sovereignty questions, and whether Greenland’s small population could eventually vote to become a U.S. territory under existing American territorial law.

Trump 2.0

An evaluation of President Donald Trump’s first year in his second term, marking the one‑year anniversary of Trump’s return to office and the official start of Trump 2.0 Year Two. Clay Travis and Buck Sexton frame this hour as a turning point—from executing the campaign agenda to actively selling Trump’s record ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, which the hosts describe as the final national referendum on Trump’s presidency.

Clay outlines eight major accomplishments of Trump’s second term so far, led by the most secure southern border in U.S. history, followed by record‑high stock prices, strong GDP growth, declining inflation despite tariffs, historic murder declines, collapsing fentanyl overdose deaths, falling mortgage rates, and four‑year‑low gas prices. Clay and Buck argue these metrics reflect decisive leadership and policy execution, even as they acknowledge lingering economic frustration among voters due to residual inflation from prior administrations. Listener polls and talkbacks show overwhelming support from Trump voters, with most grading the president’s first year an “A.”

Oppression Narratives

A major cultural segment in Hour 2 examines what Clay and Buck describe as modern left‑wing victimhood narratives, sparked by comments made on The View by actress Pam Grier claiming she witnessed lynchings as a child in Ohio. The hosts dissect historical data showing the claim is impossible given Grier’s birth year and Ohio’s documented history. They argue the story reflects a broader media failure to challenge false narratives that reinforce ideological grievance politics, highlighting how such claims go unchallenged on mainstream television. This discussion expands into a deeper breakdown of historical lynching data, including distinctions between frontier justice, mob violence, and formal definitions used by organizations like the NAACP. Buck emphasizes that lynching history is often misrepresented for political impact, while Clay argues objective reality and historical context must matter in public discourse.

Why Greenland Matters

A detailed discussion of Greenland and geopolitics, which Clay and Buck describe as one of the most important foreign‑policy themes emerging ahead of Davos. They respond to statements from European leaders, including the European Commission and Danish officials, rejecting any U.S. claim to Greenland. Clay and Buck outline Trump’s strategic rationale, focusing on Arctic security, resource access, emerging shipping lanes, and historical precedents such as the U.S. purchase of Alaska and the U.S. Virgin Islands from Denmark. They argue Trump envisions a negotiated, voluntary territorial arrangement rather than military action, potentially involving direct payments and a referendum among Greenland’s population.

Make sure you never miss a second of the show by subscribing to the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton show podcast wherever you get your podcasts! ihr.fm/3InlkL8

For the latest updates from Clay and Buck: https://www.clayandbuck.com/

Connect with Clay Travis and Buck Sexton on Social Media:
X - https://x.com/clayandbuck
FB - https://www.facebook.com/ClayandBuck/
IG - https://www.instagram.com/clayandbuck/
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck
Rumble - https://rumble.com/c/ClayandBuck
TikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@clayandbuck



YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Central Claim of the Narrative
Over 10,000 “criminal illegal aliens” have been arrested in Minneapolis alone, with: 3,000 arrests in the past six weeks
70% tied to violent crimes

These arrests are attributed to DHS and ICE operations under the Trump administration.
2. Crimes Described
The arrests are said to include individuals accused of:
Murder
Rape
Child sexual offenses
Other violent felonies
This is the “worst of the worst” offenders and the arrests are a major public safety victory.
3. Accusations Against Minnesota Leadership:
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey
of the following:
Failing to protect public safety
Undermining federal immigration enforcement
Encouraging hostility toward ICE
Obstructing law enforcement through public statements
The U.S. Department of Justice is investigating both officials for allegedly impeding federal law enforcement, though it acknowledges:
The investigation is in early stages
No subpoenas or charges are confirmed
4. Allegations of Massive Financial Fraud
At least $19 billion in fraud tied to Minneapolis alone
Federal investigators are conducting large‑scale financial investigations
Some funds went to terrorist organizations (e.g., Al‑Shabab)
5. This Federal Case also includes:
Ties to the Feeding Our Future organization:
Is a real federal investigation in Minnesota
Involves approximately $250 million in alleged pandemic-era food program fraud
Has resulted in charges against 70 individuals (between 2022–2024)
6. Media Bias Argument
CBS and CNN are deliberately misleading the public
Journalists are accused of: Lying about arrest numbers
Downplaying criminal activity
Framing DOJ actions as “intimidation”

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Role of Popular Uprising
Millions of Iranians are described as actively protesting against the ruling clerical regime.
The movement is portrayed as organic, domestic, and secular, not Islamist or anti‑Western.
Economic collapse is identified as the primary catalyst rather than a single political trigger.
Protesters are framed as the legitimate engine of change, with the U.S. positioned as a supporter rather than the instigator.
2. Economic Collapse as a Destabilizer
Hyperinflation and currency collapse (rial exceeding 1,000,000 to the dollar) have crippled daily life.
Bazaar closures, labor strikes (notably in energy), and widespread shortages are presented as systemic stressors.
Low global oil prices weaken Iran’s primary revenue source, limiting the regime’s ability to fund repression and foreign proxies.
3. U.S. Policy Contrast: Trump vs. Obama/Biden
There is a sharp contrast between: Obama/Biden: Characterized as conciliatory, passive, and supportive of engagement (e.g., Iran nuclear deal).
Trump: Portrayed as deterrence‑focused, confrontational, and openly supportive of regime change.

Trump’s public endorsement of a “new government” in Iran is framed as unprecedented and strategically consequential.
4. Deterrence Without Occupation
We reject a large‑scale military invasion.
Instead, we support: Targeted military strikes (e.g., nuclear facilities, IRGC leadership)
Covert operations
Clear deterrent threats against mass repression

The killing of Qasem Soleimani is highlighted as a key inflection point that shattered regime confidence.
5. Iran’s Strategic Weakness
Iran’s air defenses and regional influence are described as severely degraded.
Hezbollah, Hamas, and other proxies have been decapitated or weakened.
The regime is increasingly isolated as allies (Venezuela, Syria, Russia) face their own crises.
6. Internal Regime Fractures
The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is portrayed as a potential kingmaker or coup actor.
The text suggests the IRGC: Controls vast economic assets
Is deeply unpopular with the public
May abandon the clerical leadership to preserve its own power

A coup becomes likely if U.S. pressure and labor strikes converge.
7. Information Control and Fear
Internet shutdowns and communication blackouts are signs of regime panic.
Supreme Leader Khamenei fears internal reform more than outright confrontation, drawing parallels to Soviet collapse.
9. Broader Geopolitical Context
Iran’s situation is linked to potential domino effects in Venezuela and Cuba.
Energy independence and low oil prices are framed as key U.S. national security tools.
The moment is compared to the fall of the Berlin Wall, suggesting a possible systemic collapse of authoritarian regimes without U.S. ground wars.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz
X: https://x.com/tedcruz
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.