PodcastsNewsVerdict with Ted Cruz

Verdict with Ted Cruz

Premiere Networks
Verdict with Ted Cruz
Latest episode

1113 episodes

  • Verdict with Ted Cruz

    Election Night: Paxton Defeats Cornyn—What Happened, Why & What’s Next

    2026-05-27 | 39 mins.
    1. Election Results & Significance
    Ken Paxton wins decisively with roughly 64% vs 36% (a ~28-point margin).
    This is described as: A major upset for an incumbent
    A “sea change” in Republican politics

    Cornyn had: 24 years in the Senate
    Significant institutional power and funding

    Despite heavy financial backing (over $100M+ spent, mostly for Cornyn), Paxton wins overwhelmingly.
    2. Why Paxton Won
    Several factors are highlighted:
    ✅ Anti-establishment sentiment
    The race was a: “Conservative grassroots vs establishment Republican”

    Voters favored a more ideological, outsider-style candidate.
    ✅ Trump’s influence
    Donald Trump endorsed Paxton (late in the race).
    The hosts argue: The endorsement boosted Paxton’s margin
    But Paxton was already leading in polls

    ✅ Perception of ideological purity
    Paxton is: “The most conservative attorney general in the country”

    This appealed to Republican primary voters.
    3. The Role of Money
    The race becomes: One of the most expensive Senate primaries ever

    Despite: Massive spending (mostly pro-Cornyn)

    Outcome shows: 👉 Money was less decisive than voter sentiment and political alignment
    4. Warning About the General Election
    Do not assume Republicans will easily win
    Historical comparison:
    Cruz compares this to the 2018 Texas Senate race: Democrats dramatically increased turnout
    He narrowly won despite being heavily outspent

    Key risks identified:
    Energized Democratic voters
    Lower Republican turnout in non-presidential cycles
    Heavy outside funding from national donors
    5. Introduction of the Democratic Candidate
    The Democratic nominee is introduced as James Talarico.
    Ideologically extreme
    Strategically dangerous because: He presents himself in a calm, relatable manner
    He may appeal to moderate voters

    6. Strategic Concerns for Republicans
    The authors emphasize:
    🧠 Voter perception risk
    Talarico could appeal to: Moderates
    Less politically engaged voters

    🎯 Campaign advice
    Republicans should: Focus on communicating Talarico’s positions
    Drive high voter turnout
    Avoid complacency

    Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/
    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz
    X: https://x.com/tedcruz
    X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
  • Verdict with Ted Cruz

    BONUS POD: Trump Drops Uranium Ultimatum “Hand IT Over — Or It’s Gone!"

    2026-05-26 | 13 mins.
    1. Iranian Uranium Stockpile
    Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile is the central sticking point in negotiations.
    The U.S. position is: Iran must surrender, transfer, or destroy its uranium entirely
    No compromise on retaining enriched material is acceptable

    This is a more aggressive stance than past U.S. policies (e.g., Obama-era agreements focused on limits, not elimination).
    2. Diplomacy to Pressure Strategy
    Diplomatic negotiations
    Active military pressure

    Mentions: “self-defense strikes”
    naval deployments near the Strait of Hormuz

    3. Strait of Hormuz as a Global Pressure Point
    The strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz:
    ~20% of global oil supply passes through it
    Disruptions affect oil prices, inflation, and global markets

    Current situation:
    Partially open
    Highly militarized
    Unstable


    4. Negotiation Dynamics
    Multiple countries involved as mediators: Oman, Qatar, Pakistan

    Possible compromise ideas mentioned: Transfer uranium to third countries (Pakistan, Turkey, Russia, China)
    Dilution under supervision

    5. Global Stakeholders
    China → dependent on oil flow
    Europe → sensitive to energy prices
    Gulf states → reliant on exports
    Israel → concerned about security
    Russia → may benefit from energy instability
    6. Economic and Market Impact
    Disruptions to shipping have caused: Increased insurance costs
    Rerouted vessels
    Oil market volatility

    Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
    X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
  • Verdict with Ted Cruz

    Iran Deal! Separating Fact from Fiction, What's Next plus Maine's Nazi Communist Oyster Farmer

    2026-05-25 | 34 mins.
    🇮🇷 1. Iran Conflict & Potential Nuclear Deal Core Themes:
    The U.S. military campaign against Iran, has been highly successful.
    Iran’s military infrastructure (missiles, drones, navy) has been largely destroyed.
    Key Iranian leadership figures have been eliminated.

    A “good deal” must: Completely prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons.
    Eliminate or control uranium enrichment.
    Ensure open access to the Strait of Hormuz (critical for global oil shipping).

    There must be NO: Giving Iran financial concessions.
    Allowing Iran to retain nuclear capabilities.

    There is much distrust of: Iran’s messaging (described as propaganda).
    Internal U.S. political disagreements over negotiation strategy.

    🗳️ 2. U.S. Domestic Politics & Midterm Elections Core:
    Republicans are not necessarily in a weak position.
    Democratic candidates are portrayed as extreme or unelectable.

    Platner Democratic Senate candidate in Maine: Allegations of extreme ideology (communism, Nazism).
    Offensive statements and behavior.
    Undermine credibility of political opponents.
    Democrats are embracing radical candidates.


    Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/
    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz
    X: https://x.com/tedcruz
    X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
  • Verdict with Ted Cruz

    Statehood for DC & Puerto Rico? Full-Blown Political Brawl on Gerrymandering & U.S. Takes Aim at Cuban Strongman Week In Review

    2026-05-23 | 29 mins.
    1. D.C. and Puerto Rico Statehood
    The U.S. Constitution intentionally established Washington, D.C. as a non-state federal district to avoid favoritism.
    Calls for D.C. statehood are framed as a partisan power grab to gain Democratic seats in Congress.

    Puerto Rico is described as: A more complex case, with internal disagreement among residents (statehood, independence, or commonwealth status).
    Assumed—by Democrats, according to the speaker—to lean Democratic politically.

    Democrats prioritize gaining and maintaining power over policy substance.
    Election systems and rules (e.g., California’s “top-two” system) are manipulated for advantage.

    A California election example is used to suggest: A possible increase in Republican support.
    Fear among Democrats of losing control.

    2. Gerrymandering and Race
    A Senate Judiciary Committee hearing about racial gerrymandering.
    A Supreme Court decision limiting race-based redistricting.
    Both parties engage in gerrymandering, but Democrats are portrayed as worse offenders.
    Race-based districts are described as unconstitutional discrimination.
    The notion that minority candidates require racially drawn districts to win.
    Provides examples of Black Republican politicians elected in majority-white districts.



    The Democratic Party historically supported slavery, segregation, and Jim Crow laws.
    The Republican Party was founded to oppose slavery.

    3. Raúl Castro Indictment
    Reports an indictment of former Cuban leader Raúl Castro for his alleged role in the 1996 shootdown of civilian aircraft.
    Strongly condemns Castro and communism.
    Praises U.S. legal action.
    Criticizes the Obama administration for engaging diplomatically with Cuba.


    Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/
    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz
    X: https://x.com/tedcruz
    X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
  • Verdict with Ted Cruz

    Chaos in DC on Reconciliation & DOJ Judgment Fund plus Raul Castro Indicted

    2026-05-22 | 34 mins.
    1. Breakdown of Senate Disruption Over Reconciliation
    Why a planned Senate vote (a “vote-a-rama” tied to reconciliation) collapsed unexpectedly.
    Key points:
    Reconciliation is described as a process used to bypass the Senate filibuster and pass major legislation (in this case, funding border security and agencies like ICE and CBP).
    The vote was canceled due to division among Republican senators, not just opposition from Democrats.
    Several GOP senators are described as politically frustrated or weakened due to: Losing primaries or endorsements
    Conflict with former President Trump

    These internal tensions created a fragile majority, making it difficult to pass legislation.
    2. Controversy Over the DOJ “Judgment Fund”
    A newly announced $1.776 billion Department of Justice fund intended to compensate individuals allegedly harmed by government “weaponization.”
    Concerns raised:
    Republican senators reacted with anger and suspicion during a closed-door meeting with the acting Attorney General.
    Some believed the fund looked like “self-dealing,” particularly because it stemmed from litigation involving Donald Trump.
    There were fears that: Taxpayer money could go to controversial recipients
    Political optics would damage Republicans

    Senators across the party were reportedly yelling and openly hostile, suggesting unusually intense internal conflict.
    Impact:
    Democrats planned to introduce amendments targeting the fund.
    Enough Republicans were prepared to side with Democrats that the bill would likely fail.
    Leadership postponed the vote, indicating a temporary legislative breakdown.
    3. Raul Castro Indictment Discussion
    Castro is accused in connection with the 1996 shootdown of civilian aircraft operated by “Brothers to the Rescue.”
    Charges allegedly include: Conspiracy to kill U.S. nationals
    Murder counts
    Destruction of aircraft
    A major moment of justice
    A stark contrast with past U.S. policy under President Obama (who pursued diplomatic normalization with Cuba)


    Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/
    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz
    X: https://x.com/tedcruz
    X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
More News podcasts
About Verdict with Ted Cruz
Join Senator Ted Cruz and co-host Ben Ferguson as they break down the most important news stories of the day and reveal what they mean for you. On "Verdict with Ted Cruz,” you will go behind the scenes of the political debates that define our country. "Verdict with Ted Cruz" is being brought to you by Jobs, Freedom, and Security PAC, a political action committee dedicated to supporting conservative causes, organizations, and candidates across the country. In 2022, Jobs, Freedom, and Security PAC plans to donate to conservative candidates running for Congress and help the Republican Party across the nation.
Podcast website

Listen to Verdict with Ted Cruz, World Report and many other podcasts from around the world with the radio.net app

Get the free radio.net app

  • Stations and podcasts to bookmark
  • Stream via Wi-Fi or Bluetooth
  • Supports Carplay & Android Auto
  • Many other app features
Verdict with Ted Cruz: Podcasts in Family