Top stations Podcasts Live sports Near you Genres Topics

Podcasts EducationSupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)

Listen to this podcast in the app for free:

radio.net

Sleep timer

Save favourites

Download for free in the App Store

Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)

Attorney RJ Dieken, Loki Esq Law, Montana

Education Government

Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)

Latest episode

542 episodes

M & K Employee Solutions, Inc. v. Trustees of IAM Nat. Pension
2026-05-26 | 9 mins.
Send us Fan Mail
Actuaries should probably use the best/most recent predictions about future stuff, and we should not try to tell them not to.

Also lets keep track of how many times The Court says: "Stuff that's not in here is not in here for a reason, BONUS POINTS: when the excluded (or desired) terminology is in the same Congressional Act.
Support the show
MONTGOMERY v. CARIBE TRANSPORT II, LLC
2026-05-24 | 9 mins.
Send us Fan Mail
A claim that one company negligently hired another to transport goods is not preempted by the FAAAA because States retain authority
Support the show
HAVANA DOCKS CORP. v. ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES
2026-05-24 | 12 mins.
Send us Fan Mail
Held: The cruise lines’ use of the docks is sufficient to establish that they used “property which was confiscated by the Cuban Government”; Ha vana Docks is not required to establish that the cruise lines trafficked in Havana Dock’s property interest. Pp. 8–16. (a) Title III generally makes any person who “traffics in property which was confiscated by the Cuban Government . . . liable to any United States national who owns the claim to such property.” §6082(a)(1)(A). This dispute turns on whether the relevant “property which was confiscated” must be Havana Docks’ property interest in the docks (the concession), or whether it could instead be the docks them selves.
Support the show
JULES v. ANDRE BALAZS PROPERTIES (ARBITRATION, CIVIL PROCEDURE, FEDERAL COURT JURISDICTION)
2026-05-24 | 13 mins.
Send us Fan Mail
A federal court that has previously stayed claims in a pending ac tion under §3 of the FAA has jurisdiction to confirm or vacate a result ing arbitral award on those claims as prescribed in §9 and §10 of the FAA; nothing in the FAA precludes the normal operation of federal jurisdiction regarding live claims pending before a federal court.
LokiEsq.Law
Rev. RJ Dieken, Esq
Support the show
FIRST CHOICE WOMEN’S RESOURCE CENTERS v. DAVENPORT, A.G. OF NEW JERSEY (1A and donor records)
2026-05-01 | 8 mins.
Send us Fan Mail
First Choice has established a present injury to its First Amend ment associational rights sufficient to confer Article III standing.
Support the show

More Education podcasts

Trending Education podcasts

About Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)

Following what the Supreme Court is actually doing can be daunting. Reporting on the subject is often only done within the context of political narratives of the day -- and following the Court's decisions and reading every new case can be a non-starter. The purpose of this Podcast is to make it as easy as possible for members of the public to source information about what is happening at the Supreme Court. For that reason, we read every Opinion Syllabus without any commentary whatsoever. Further, there are no advertisements or sponsors. We call it "information sourcing," and we hope that the podcast is a useful resource for members of the public who want to understand the legal issues of the day, prospective law students who want to get to know legal language and understand good legal writing, and attorneys who can use the podcast to be better advocates for their clients. *Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.

Podcast website

Education Government News Politics