Crisis Lab

In the Season 5 premiere, host Kyle King asks one question: what should we have been paying attention to? A blackout in Berlin, a fatal train collision in Spain, and the systematic destruction of Ukraine's power grid all point to the same pattern. The signal wasn't in the incidents. It was in the structural failures that preceded them.

After a year of diagnosing what's broken, Kyle argues 2026 has to be about discernment. The profession isn't short on information. It's drowning in it. This episode separates signal from noise: single points of failure, unheard warnings, and survival duration metrics are signal. Threat briefings without operational implications and recycled frameworks are noise dressed as vigilance.

This isn't a call for more awareness. It's a call for the discipline to focus on what counts.

Show Highlights
[00:00] Three countries, three causes, one question
[01:00] Berlin's blackout: arson at a single junction point
[01:30] Spain's train collision: warnings raised months before
[02:00] Ukraine's grid at a third of peacetime capacity
[03:30] What Crisis Lab diagnosed in 2025
[04:45] The structural pattern behind all three incidents
[07:00] From diagnosis to discernment: what 2026 demands
[07:45] Finding single points of failure before adversaries do
[08:15] Signal vs. noise: what actually changes Monday morning?
[09:15] Survival duration: the metric that matters most
[10:00] Building discernment through deliberate community
[10:45] Why Crisis Lab built The Forum

Go Deeper: Crisis Lab Toolkits
Listening is one thing. Applying it is another. Every Crisis Lab article comes with a companion toolkit: frameworks, checklists, and operational tools built for practitioners who need to act, not just stay informed.
Free for all Crisis Lab subscribers.
👉 news.crisislab.io/toolkits

In this special year-end episode of the Crisis Lab Podcast, host Kyle King sits down with a panel of industry leaders: Todd De Voe, Matt Green, Anastasia Maynich, Laura James, and Ralph Bloemers. They dissect the chaotic landscape of 2025 and the evolving role of the emergency manager.

What it reveals: the dangerous lag between the velocity of modern crises and our traditional response systems. It also exposes the "capacity illusion" which is the belief that government agencies alone can handle the scale of today's disasters.

Between the LA wildfires and the cascading infrastructure failures of 2025, the profession learned a hard lesson. Operational confidence can no longer mask the fragility of our communities.

The panel tracks how "governance from 30,000 feet" often disconnects resources from the people who need them most. This creates a dangerous gap where policy meets reality.

This conversation offers not a celebration of resilience, but a call to action. It reflects on the need to embrace "complex adaptive systems" rather than rigid command structures.

It challenges the sector's hesitation to truly engage the public. It forces us to ask a hard question. Are we building systems that protect the status quo? Or are we ready to let communities lead their own recovery?

Show Highlights

[03:06] Introducing the Panel of Experts

[07:02] The impact of speed and complexity in crisis response

[09:33] The reality of under-resourced local emergency managers

[29:37] Engaging community voices over official messaging

[39:25] Understanding Fire Risks

[40:02] The Role of Emergency Managers

[41:12] How top-down governance fails neighborhood reality

[42:43] Complex Adaptive Systems

[44:35] Emergency Management Challenges

[47:52] Learning from indigenous wisdom and fire stewardship

[53:25] Why every home needs its own emergency manager

[54:37] Recovery and Long-Term Challenges

[01:03:17] Predictions for 2026: The context-switching trap

[01:17:46] Closing Thoughts and Resources

Connect with the Guests

Anastasia Maynich

LinkedIn: Anastasia Maynich MA, MS

YouTube: XanamayX

Website: xanamayx.com

Podcast: Beyond the SOP

Matt Green

LinkedIn: Matt Green

Newsletter: State of Disaster

Book Club: Disaster Discourse

Company: GEMS Ready

Todd De Voe

LinkedIn: Todd Thayer De Voe, MPA, CEM®

Substack: Todd T. De Voe

Newsletter: Emergency Management Network

Laura James

LinkedIn: Laura James

Podcast: Resilient HERoes

Ralph Bloemers

LinkedIn: Ralph Bloemers

In this episode of the Crisis Lab Podcast, host Kyle King speaks with Tom Sivak, Chief Emergency Manager at Emergency Management One, about the fundamental shift in the crisis management profession from a knowledge economy to an allocation economy.

What it reveals: the unsustainable nature of manual information processing in an era of polycrisis and velocity.

With emergency management agencies facing chronic understaffing and budgets that demand "more with less," the traditional model of the "Rolodex leader" who holds the entire plan in their head is failing. Sivak argues that trying to manually process the astronomical amount of data in modern crises is no longer a badge of honor, it is a strategic vulnerability.

This conversation offers a pragmatic roadmap for operationalizing AI not as a tech trend, but as a survival mechanism. It reflects what modern leadership demands: moving from being the "writer" of every brief to the "editor" of intelligence, building "blue sky" muscle memory so tools work when the pressure mounts, and reclaiming the "gut intuition" that only a human can provide.

Show Highlights

[04:00] Why AI is the only scalable solution for the "do more with less" mandate

[06:00] The "Forethought" Principle: Why using AI only during disasters guarantees failure

[08:00] Parallels to 1994: How the industry feared the internet before it became essential

[13:00] The maturity model shift: Moving leaders from "writers" to "editors"

[17:00] Using efficiency to focus on community resilience and mental health

[21:00] The Human Lever: Why algorithms can process data but cannot replace gut intuition

[23:00] Why value now comes from directing resources, not retaining facts

[25:00] Validating the Emergency Manager's role as the original "Allocation" leader

In this episode of the Crisis Lab Podcast, host Kyle King sits down with Brenden Winder (Christchurch City Council). They dissect the fourteen year recovery journey following the Christchurch earthquakes.

What it reveals: the dangerous illusion of short term success in emergency management. It also exposes the silent erosion of institutional memory.

Between the 2010 earthquake (where systems appeared to hold) and the devastating 2011 event that claimed 185 lives, Christchurch learned a hard lesson. Operational confidence can mask systemic fragility.

Winder tracks how the rush to add governance layers actually reduced transparency. This created barriers between resources and the community they were meant to serve.

This retrospective offers not a celebration of resilience, but a warning. It reflects on the "asymmetry of recovery." Infrastructure is rebuilt while deep pockets of community trauma remain.

It challenges the sector's reliance on international templates. It forces us to ask a hard question. Are we building systems that actually fit the local 80%? Or are we just applying the international 20%?

Show Highlights

[00:00] The limits of international frameworks in the face of neighborhood reality

[03:00] The dangerous gap between perceived success (2010) and catastrophic reality (2011)

[06:00] When adding more governance structure reduces community transparency

[08:00] How election cycles and staff turnover erase the "intellectual property" of disaster response

[17:00] Why "returning to normal" is a myth when infrastructure rebounds faster than people

[21:00] Why international best practice is only a fraction of the solution

[24:00] Contrasting the US emergency management "struggle session" with New Zealand's depoliticized approach

In this episode of the Crisis Lab Podcast, host Kyle King examines Sweden's transformation from traditional emergency management to integrated security governance.

What it reveals: the gray zone reality facing emergency management professionals across Europe.

Throughout 2025, coordinated Russian operations across Baltic civilian infrastructure exposed fundamental flaws in crisis management systems built for discrete events.

Sweden's response offers not a blueprint to copy, but a mirror. It reflects what sustained multi-domain pressure demands: rethinking where emergency management sits in governance, how capability distributes across society, and what "prepared" means when crises don't end.

Show Highlights

[0:40] Russia's systemic campaigns across European civilian infrastructure in 2025

[01:44] Gray zone operations overwhelm traditional emergency management coordination

[03:00] Denmark's reality check: Copenhagen Airport shutdowns connect to shadow fleets and cyber intrusions

[03:50] Sweden's systematic rebuild treats gray zone reality as permanent operating condition

[05:07] Total Defence integration model eliminates separation between military and civilian crisis management

[09:36] Why surge capacity models collapse under continuous multi-domain pressure

[12:00] The fundamental question: governance change or improved emergency response?

[13:00] Missing piece: institutional recognition that informal coordination networks are the foundation of evolution

Connect with Kyle King

LinkedIn